December 31, 2005

A flurry of end-of the-year action

Wow, I thought that the end of the year would kind of fade out, and I would be writing some vague, philosophical essay about the meaning of it all, but instead, a bunch of people ran really fast yesterday and suddenly there's a lot to talk about.

Do the Brockton runners read my blog? A couple of days after wondering where the hell all their distance runners went, they all appeared to run at the Tri-County league meet Dec. 30th. Mass. Div I XC runner-up Kevin Gill ran 4:31 in the mile, to win his section easily, and Jose DePina ran ran 10:05 in the deuce to garner another easy win. And Brockton produced another talent, Michael Honsa, who wasn't on the radar during XC, but laid down a 10:09 for second place. I guess reports of Brockton's demise were a bit premature. (They still don't have any sprinters, though; what's with that?)

Meanwhile, at the same meet, Mark Amirault was reminding us that he is the best 2-miler in the state right now. After loafing through a 4:34 mile (letting his teammate Alec Bleday win), Amirault cruised a 9:34 two-miler to beat Catholic Memorial's Matt Dewey by three seconds. Will Amirault opt for the 2-mile at the state meet to avoid a showdown with Polgar? It also looks like Xaverian has the horses for a very good 4x800 relay with Amirault, Bleday, Dan Higgins, and Andrew MacIsaac (2:45 to win the 1000 yesterday).

The other big news yesterday came from the Brown Univ. Christmas Relays, where Dennis Yarmouth junior Colleen Wetherbee ran 4:57.61, finishing a few seconds back of one Footlocker finalist (Lindsay Ferguson) and seven seconds ahead of another Footlocker finalist (Hanna Davidson). There hasn't been much news among the state's top girl middle distance runners, but that time on Brown's flat track is very impressive. Dennis Yarmouth also ran a 4x800 team that finished 6th in the championship race in 10:08.22. But another Mass. team, Bishop Feehan, ran even faster, recording 10:06.83 for 5th place.

In the same meet on the boys' side, Lexington's Willi Ballenthin (2005 MA State Indoor runner-up in the 1000) ran 4:23.36 to squeeze into second, only 0.03 behind Saratoga Springs' Greg Kelsey and just ahead of Stephen Murdock. By my count, four Mass. runners have run the 1M under 4:30 so far this season. They are:


Dave Polgar (Newton North) 4:17.83
Polgar 4:22.62
Willi Ballenthin (Lexington) 4:23.36
Sam Horn (Reading) 4:27.70
Matt Dewey (Catholic Memorial) 4:29.29


Add Amirault and Gill to that mix, and it looks like a pretty good year for milers. Of course, we don't know who is going to run what at the big meets.

In the fine print of the results, Methuen recorded an excellent time in the Distance Medley relay, clocking 10:39. That means they have some outstanding distance talent, but haven't had a chance to show it in individual events yet.

A last note: As I write this it is 12:55 p.m., and over at BU, Noah Jampol is getting ready to break 2:00 for the 800 for the first time. Good luck, Noah!!

And Happy 2006, everyone!

December 30, 2005

Should you run when you're sick?

As I recover from a cold (and hope it doesn't lead to a sinus infection), it seems appropriate to consider this age-old question: when the body is fighting off illness, should the athlete keep training? Should he or she train differently? If rest is required, how much rest?

I truly wish there were simple answers to these questions, but in my own experience I haven't found anything simple about the experience of training and racing when sick. Let's say that there are two extreme positions: "old school" and "new school." The old school approach is to consider illness to be one more form of weakness that can be overcome by effort. An old school athlete runs when sick, and eventually gets better and is stronger for the experience ("what doesn't kill me makes me stronger"). The new school approach is to consider illness as a warning sign that the body needs healing before it can resume training. The new school athlete takes two days off, gets better, and gradually works up to hard training again. ("What doesn't kill me still leaves me in a weakened, compromised state that inhibits progressive adaptation and improvement.") So which school is better?

I have taken both approaches in my own running career, and have dispensed both "old school" and "new school" advice to athletes I have coached. The results are inconclusive. Worse than that, the results are contradictory. I once ran a brilliant half-marathon while suffering from the early stages of a cold, and recovered surprisingly quickly. I once ran a 10K race with a cold and developed a frightening case of bronchitis that kept me out of action for nearly a month. I have done track workouts while sick that seemed to hasten my cure, and I have done track workouts when sick that seemed to bring on far worse bouts of illness than what would have been expected. I have skipped track workouts when sick in the hope that I would recover faster, and then have failed to recover faster. It has been, as they say, a mixed bag.

One reason to train through illness is that NOT training doesn't always make you feel better. I mean psychologically as well as physically. One reason to AVOID training through an illness is that hard training has been shown to temporarily weaken the immune system, not a good thing when you are harboring nasty germs.

If I had to summarize the moderate approach, I would say that one should fore-go HARD training while sick, but not necessarily take complete reset. I'd also say avoid all racing when sick unless it is a really important race, for example one you have trained for all season. Thus, if you have a cold or a sore throat or a headache, run easy. Easy running means making it completely aerobic - nothing that involves really hard breathing or placing your body in extreme duress. I think there's little risk that such moderate exercise will lengthen the duration of a common cold. On the other hand, don't do that killer 4 x 1M workout that you had planned. Don't go out for a 15 mile long run in sub-freezing temperature. In other words, don't extend yourself. When you're sick, you're more likely to break.

I haven't even mentioned one of the other factors that comes into play: hypochondria. It turns out that many runners are hypochondriacs. When under mental stress, such as when approaching an important workout or race, they experience symptoms of illness without the actual illness. Far from being crazy, these athletes are actually rather typical. One of the important reasons to not automatically shut it down when you are feeling the early signs of a cold, is to counter this natural tendency to "worry yourself sick." Hypochondria, like other forms of self-doubt, needs to be understood and confronted to be overcome.

Finally, there is the rare malady of the athlete who refuses to take time off, even when continuing to train is obviously counter-productive, if not dangerous. If hypochondria is the result of one kind of insecurity, its opposite is the result of another kind of insecurity: the fear that taking any time off at all is an unacceptable form of weakness. This is where a coach can be very helpful in setting limits that an athlete might not want to set for himself or herself.

So, to conclude, should you run when you're sick?

What, do I look like a doctor?

December 29, 2005

Home for the Holidays

Is there life for runners after high school? Yeah, sure there is... but it doesn't always resemble the frenetic, highly-charged, week-to-week existence of the Newton North track and field athlete. It's never more evident than during winter vacation when so many Newton North alumni are home visiting friends and families. Let's catch up with a few of them to find out how their running careers have moved on since their days at North.

It was quite a sight on Tuesday afternoon to see Chris Barnicle and Dan King doing 200s together at Reggie, weaving around crowds of oblivious 15- and 16-year-olds. As readers of this blog know, Chris is running XC and track at Arkansas. He says he'll be racing the mile on January 13th at the Arkansas Invitational in Fayetteville. No word on whether he and his mates might run a distance medley team at the Boston Indoor Games. Dan, a former state champ in the 200 meters, is now a junior at Duke, where he concentrates on the 400. On December 24, he ran 48.7 at the BU mini-meet to win against another former Mass. HS star, Mansfield's Terry Young.

Also working out at Reggie were former teammates and all-scholastics Liz Fulton and Simone Weisman. Liz attends Yale and is running indoor track, but admits freely that school is more important to her right now than track. Simone is attending Middlebury, where she has become good friends with former Wellesley standout Alexandra Krieg.

With my duaghter Joni home for a few weeks, I have had a chance to catch up with several of her friends from the Newton North class of 2002. Sam Ronfard, one of the captains of the undefeated 2001 XC team, is about to start his final semester at Tufts, and plans to spend at least a year teaching in the New York City Public School system after he graduates. Sam also ran the Paris Marathon last Fall with his dad, and has dreams of runnning in Boston in 2007. Two other members of that 2001 team, Ben Heidlage and Gerrit Albertson are also visiting this week. Ben is finishing up his senior year at Pomona and is in the process of applying to law schools. Gerrit is attending Vassar and is working in his senior thesis in Art History. Neither of them has admitted to doing any running lately.

Azuree Catledge, now a freshman at Howard University, was at Reggie last week doing a workout. I didn't have a chance to talk to her, so I'm not sure what event -- long jump, triple, hurdles, sprints -- she will be focusing on this winter.

Newton North assistant coach Shawn Wallace, an accomplished middle-distance ace at BC, made his return to competition after a couple of years off, running a 4:31 mile at the BU Mini-meet. Wallace, a former sub 4:10 miler, won his heat by almost 80 meters. Watch out Dave Polgar!

December 28, 2005

Where have you gone, Jose DePina?

Brockton Boys won the 2005 Div I Mass XC championships, and then they... disappeared.

Well, not exactly. I notice from the results of the latest Tri-County Indoor Track meet that super soph Carlos Montrond ran a 4:54 mile, and another soph, James DuBeau ran a very nice 4:44 in the same race. But where are all the other stars from that Brockton team? Where are Jose DePina, Kevin Gill, and Geovanni Timberlake? How can it be that Brockton -- a school of 5000 students -- doesn't have anyone breaking 3:00 in the 1000, or 10:40 in the 2-Mile?

It is a mystery where these Brockton distance runners go in the winter. Maybe they don't really consider indoor track to be a sport, but rather a training period that is preparation for greater glory in outdoor track. Maybe they take the long-term view, and start out very slowly while other teams are cramming in speedwork. Or maybe the seniors simply step aside and let the sophomores take over. (Brockton's top finisher in the 2-Mile is also a sophomore).

I would much rather think that Brockton's relative weakness in the early season meet results is evidence of some master plan, than think that their outstanding distance runners are hurt, burned out, or disaffected in some way. After all, last year Jose DePina (5th in the 2004 State XC meet) took the indoor season off completely, and then returned to run second to Chris Barnicle in the outdoor state 2M. Brockton's Kevin Gill started slow, but finished 6th in the 2004 Indoor 1M (as a sophomore!) and ran well in outdoor track. So maybe they're just playing possum.

Nevertheless, Brockton dual meet indoor track record stands at 0-2 after losses to Xaverian and BC High. Can you imagine if Newton North Girls or Boys had an 0-2 record? I'm not sure that's ever happened, at least not in the long tenure of the current coaches.

So if Brockton runners aren't putting up big times, who is?

Xaverian's Mark Amirault recorded a 2:35 1000 to take the State lead in that event. He'll almost certainly move up to the 1M or 2M for the State meet. We haven't heard from the Lexington boys yet, but Willi Ballenthin is one of the favorities for the State 1M title. Matt Dewey, a junior from Catholic Memorial ran a 4:29 mile on Tuesday, the fastest non-Polgar time this winter so far. After a rich year for 600 runners last year, no one that I know of has run faster than 1:27 this year so far, leaving that event wide open.

I keep telling myself, it's early. It's very early.

December 27, 2005

The last week of December is Indoor Track's last week of summer...

After several weeks of holiday-related stress and endless social commitments that culminated in my participating in a family tradition of sharing with my kids a truly nasty Christmas cold, I found myself limping (figuratively) toward the end of the year trying to keep some momentum in my training.

It's a tough week, this last week of December, with its vacation hours, its travel, and its family commitments. It's tough also because of the temptation to take it easy, to feel the need to take it easy (perhaps to recover from the holiday, or the days that preceded it?). I feel sympathy with the kids who come in at 9:00 or 9:30 in the morning every day during vacation.

The last week of December is like the last week of summer vacation before cross-country. This one week of training doesn't guarantee anything -- not records, not championships. But on the other extreme, the failure to continue training during this week can derail an entire indoor season. Not everyone trains during this time. Families travel. Schedules are turned upside down. Some people just feel the need to enjoy themselves without the added stress of running. It's a time when you really notice the difference between the athletes who want to train and those who view it as necessary, but not enjoyable.

I admit, I find training easier than being with my relatives. Both activities are stressful, but training makes me stronger and more confident, whereas family dinners with my in-laws leave me a broken man. But I digress.

Training is about making steady progress over time. Therefore, training tends to be most effective when it becomes routine, even boring. When training, an athlete wants to be free of distractions and able to direct energy into the sport. In other words, Christmas is a particulary difficult time to be training. Furthermore, to the outside world -- to friends and family, to holiday visitors -- training looks like an anti-social behavior completely at odds with the spirit of the season.

I woke up Christmas morning and I went for a run. It was just barely light and the eternal dull roar of the Mass Pike was reduced to an occasional distant rush of a single car on an obscure errand. I didn't feel great -- my head ached and my sinuses were bothering me -- but the run wasn't really bad at all. I had a chance to be alone with my thoughts, to have a little personal time before the onslaught. The next day, Monday, it was back to practice.

I was surprised at how few kids were there, but then I remembered how many of them were out of town visiting relatives during their week off from school. I also noted that others besides myself had caught colds ...or worse... and wouldn't be doing much. Outside, a light but persistent rain fell. It was just another day. Just the way I like it.

December 26, 2005

Dave Polgar - 4:17.83

When David Polgar ran 4:17.83 at the BU meet, there was a small but significant shifting of the the universe of Mass. high school running. Breaking 4:20 for the first time is always a big deal, but Polgar's run was about more than besting a numerical barrier. With that time, run early in the season off limited speedwork, Polgar staked his claim as the favorite to repeat as Mass. State indoor mile champion, achieved national attention as he tries to earn a berth in the Millrose Games HS mile, and probably achieved his goal of increasing the value of college scholarships he might be offered.

Of course, David Polgar is already a legend at Newton North for his talent as a runner, his prodigious appetite for junk food, his dreadlocks, his competitive fire, his generous personality, his leadership abilities... oh, and did I mention the dreadlocks? On any other stage, David Polgar would long ago have been the star attraction, but for three years he has run in the shadow of Chris Barnicle, and so this larger-than-life figure has, amazingly, remained somewhat unpublicized. But no more.

Polgar's national reputation actually began with his 3:05 1200 meter leg at the Penn Relay's last year. That was a revelation to those who thought that Newton North was "Barnicle plus three other guys." Now Polgar has an early mark in the mile that should put him in the top 5 in the US. The question is, can he bring that time down, and by how much?

Last year, 25 HS runners ran 4:17 or better indoors, but only 14 ran 4:16 or better. Improving by even a couple of seconds would be huge. It looks like Polgar will have his chances. Rumor has it he is planning to run in the Hispanic Games at the NY Armory on January 7th. Should he win that race, Polgar would earn an automatic entry into the Millrose Games HS mile, and a chance to run in Madison Square Garden. Of course, Barnicle won the Millrose HS mile last year.

Is it possible for Polgar to eclipse Barnicle's lifetime 1M best of 4:11.93? Although it's only six seconds, it looms as a large gap for Polgar to close. After all, Barnicle ran that time as a junior and never broke it as a senior. Barnicle also ran 4:16.58 as a sophomore (losing to Victor Gras in the State Indoor championships). It might not seem like much to improve six seconds with a whole season in front of you, but it is a formidable task. For now, Polgar is focused on training hard, staying healthy, and taking his shots. It's working out well for him so far, and it's nice to see him finally getting the recognition he deserves.

December 18, 2005

Winterfest

Some great performances for Newton North athletes at Winterfest. It's too bad the meet wasn't well attended by large schools (Brockton, Lexington, Xaverian, etc.). On the other hand, it was nice to see some of the Central Mass. schools like Wachusett, Algonquin, Shephard Hill, etc.

On the girl's side, Julie Blanchard won the 300 in 43.49, only a few tenths of her PR, and looking closer to her old self. That's good news for the Tigers because Julie is a potential state meet scorer in the 300, and also is a key on their 4x200 relay team, which finished 2nd today by only 0.02 out of the unseeded heat.

Kat Chiong also looked impressive, running 1:40.49 to win the 600, a much better performance than her opening 1:46 at the Brookline meet on Thursday. Lily Brown challenged for the lead at one point, but settled for 3rd in a PR 1:44.52.

The girls distance crew took the day off, but the boys distance runners were out in force, trying for the elusive "distance sweep" of the 1000, 1M, and 2M. David Polgar won the mile leading the whole way, running 400m splits of 64-66-66-66 for 4:22, about 5 seconds ahead of Reading's Sam Horn. Doug Brecher won the 2M in 9:59.9 and he also led the entire way. Noah Jampol made a great attempt to win the 100, but settled for 2nd in a PR 2:38.76.

In the 4x800 relay, the quartet of Peter Sun (2:09), Seb Putzys (2:10), Jampol (2:06), and Polgar (1:58), won fairly easily over St. John's Prep.

Once again the NN sprinter -- girls and boys -- showed great depth. Gordon Forbes, Caelin Robinson, and Khlale Pritchard finished 3rd, 4th, and 7th in the 55M dash finals, with Forbes running a 6.80 PR. In the 55 hurdles, Brendan Rooney had only the 7th best qualifying time, but ran brilliantly in the final to take 2nd in a PR 8.39. For the girls, Leah Weisman and Morgan Faer placed 4th and 6th in the 55M hurdle finals.

In the field events, David Smith won the shot put, breaking 50' for the first time this year (50' 1.75") and Nick van Niel placed 3rd in the Long jump at 19' 1.25".

Next up for the Tigers is Weymouth on Thursday. It should be the girls' toughest dual meet of the year.

December 16, 2005

Meet Recap: NNHS v. Brookline

The first indoor track meet of the year in the BSC is always an energetic swirl of competition and near-chaos. The cross-country kids haven't seen each other for a few weeks, and fraternize, while the football and soccer players try to remember how to run or jump without someone trying to haul them down or dispossess them of a ball.

The races are a lot of fun, even if they don't tell you too much. What I mean is that a lot of people don't run particularly fast their first time out, especially in the distance events, so it's hard to predict where everyone will be in 10 weeks. I have seen plenty of milers improve 15-20 seconds from their first race to their last indoor meet. I've seen plenty of two-milers improve by almost a minute.

A lot of kids run the first lap of their first race as though there were bonuses for leading at 200m, 400m, etc. That's ok, they'll learn to pace a little bit better, and it certainly shows desire and heart to go out really fast and then die a horrible, painful death in the later laps.

The Newton North girls are once again foridable. Their 76-5 win over Brookline last night was the most lopsided of all the meets, and it would have been an even greater margin had the teams decided to contest the 4x400 relay, which North certainly would have won. There is hardly an event in which North isn't favored. Yesterday, Haleigh Smith (1M) and Jess Barton (1000) recorded league bests in their events, while Kat Chiong (600), Lily Brown (300), Alex Blenis (HJ), and Morgan Faer (SP) recorded the second best mark in the league in theirs. Next week's meet against Weymouth will be a test, but it will be a test that the Tigers should handle fairly easily.

Performance of the day for the girls? Maybe Barton's 3:12 in the 1000, or Brown's 44.40 in the 300. Or Leah Weisman's 8.02 in the 55. There were also impressive performances from freshman, including Nora Barnicles 5:54 to take third in the 1M, Carolyn Ranti's 13:03 to win the 2M, and Michelle Kaufman's 8.04 to take 2nd in the 55.

The boys have undergone a transformation over the past two seasons from a team with tremendous depth in the distance events, to a team with depth in sprinting and hurdling - and shot putting - North always seems to have good shot putters. Of course having David Polgar (1M), Noah Jampol (1000), and Doug Brecher (2M) will earn them wins against most teams in the distances, it doesn't appear that they'll sweep many meets in those events. The Tigers DID sweep the 55 dash (Caelin Robinson, Gordon Forbes, and Anthony Ambrosi) with three of the top four times in the league, and they DID sweep the shot put (David Smith, Marvin Chan, Anthony Ambrosi). Those two sweeps, along with a league-best win in the 4x400 created a comfortable margin over rival Brookline.

Performance of the day for the boys? Polgar and Jampol won quite easily, but weren't really pressed. David Smith threw 49 feet, which puts him on top of the league -- for now. I 'd have to say it was Caelin Robinson's blistering 6.81 in the 55, followed by his opening leg on the winning 4x4 relay. Most impressive newcomer? Perhaps it would be Jared Plotkin, who ran 1:30 in the 600.

Next up: Winterfest on Sunday, Dec. 18.

November 20, 2005

Post State-Meet Thoughts

Well, the prediction business ain't easy.

I went on record as saying that Amherst could take down Brockton in the Boys Div I race. Oops. Big mistake. Brockton looked dominant. Amherst looked like they were never in the chase, and finished a somewhat distant fourth. Brookline finished second (I predicted them fourth), and Mansfield finished 3rd.

In the individual race, I picked Steve Czupryna to win -- but he finished third. It looks like I was, as Noah Jampol said, overrating the difficulty of the Western Mass course when I made my picks.

Here's how my other individual predictions went:


My picks Actual
1. Czupryna Amirault
2. Amirault Gill
3. Polgar Czupryna
4. Gill Andrews
5. Collins Collins (I got that right!)

1. Amherst 98 Brockton 58
2. Brockton 101 Brookline 93
3. St. John's 121 Mansfield 99
4. Brookline 138 Amherst 117


Not a very good showing. Perhaps St. John's would have bailed me out if their top runner had not had to drop out. As it is, they finished 7th.


In the girls race, I did somewhat better:


My picks Actual
1. Kasper Kasper
2. Barton Wetherbee
3. O'Laughlin Barton
4. Bourdeau Karys
5. Karys Pancoast
6. Wetherbee Smrcina

1. Amherst 98 Amherst 85
2. Newton South 127 Newton South 88
3. Dennis Yarmouth 148 Dennis Yarmouth 92
4. Haverhill 171 Westford Academy 147
5. Wachusett 178 Haverhill 162


The big over-achievers were Newton South and Dennis Yarmouth. Wachusett didn't do so well, just as St. John's didn't do so well in the boys race. Maybe I over-estimated the difficulty of the Gardner course!

November 18, 2005

All-State Girls Div I Preview

In the Girls Div I race, the team race should come down to three teams: Amherst, Newton South, and Dennis Yarmouth, in that order. The Newton South team is lead by freshman Kelsey Krays, who will certainly be looking for a top-five finish as an individual.

Standing in their way, however, is Amherst. Lacking a superstar, Amherst still managed to place six runners in the top ten in the WMass meet, and that kind of packing should make the difference in the State Championships.

On the other hand, South is very familiar with the Franklin Park course, having run it at Bay States, the Dual-County League championships, and the EMass meet. Is South stale at all after their big win last Saturday? If so, then Dennis-Yarmouth could challenge for the runner-up position. My predictions for the team scores in Girls Div I:

1. Amherst 98
2. Newton South 127
3. Dennis Yarmouth 148
4. Haverhill 171
5. Wachusett 178

Also: Concord-Carlisle, Cathedral (Springfield), Longmeadow

In the individual race, all eyes will be on Jess Barton as she seeks to defend her state championship. Standing in her way are Longmeadow's Emily Bourdeau, Wachusett's Kim Shooshan, and most dangerously, North Andover's Kirsten Kasper. Kasper had the fastest time at Franklin Park last Saturday, running 18:34.

Here's the way I see it:

1. Kasper, No. Andover
2. Barton, Newton North
3. O'Laughlin, Boston Latin
4. Bourdeau, Longmeadow
5. Krays, Newton South
6. Weatherbee, Dennis Yarmouth

Good luck to all runners on Saturday!

November 17, 2005

And the Winner of the All-State Meet will be...

Boys All-State Preview:

There will be a boys Div I team champion in 2005: The defending champs, Newton North, failed to qualify for the All-State meet. The heir apparent seems to be Brockton, the EMass Div I champions and the runners-up in the 2004 EMass championships and in the 2004 State meet in Gardner.

But is it a foregone conclusion that Brockton will win? What about Brookline and their 35-second spread from first to fifth? What about Mansfield, who went 1-2-3 in the EMass Div. II meet. What about St. John's from Central Mass.? What about Amherst, who won the Western Mass meet at Northfield Mountain?

And how will Dave Polgar and Doug Brecher fare as individuals against statewide competition?

Before I share my predictions, let me say that comparing the results from various meets in XC is exceedingly difficult. Eastern Mass. and Western Mass. championships are held on 5K courses, but the Western Mass. course is much harder. On the other hand, the mud at Franklin Park last Saturday definitely affected times. And the Central Mass. course is only 2.9 Miles. To compare results in a meaningful way, I went back to 2002, the last year that featurd this same arrangement of meets (same locations for EMass, Central Mass, and Western Mass; State meet at Franklin Park). I then compared average times for the top teams at each of their regional meets to the average times they recorded at Franklin Park at the State Meet. I then applied a "coure condition" factor to try to take into account the generally poor conditions of certain course on certain days. Finally, I combined all of this year's regional meet results into one, threw out the individuals (who don't score) and counted the finishers for each team (who do score).

I concluded that two teams stand above the rest: Amherst and Brockton, with Amherst holding a slight edge. After that, another three teams are very close: St. John's, Brookline, and Mansfield, with St. John's the most likely to nab the 3rd spot. Her are the numbers:

1. Amherst 95
2. Brockton 101
3. St. John's 121
4. Brookline 138
5. Mansfield 144

Of course, there will be teams that over-achieve and under-achieve. It will be interesting to see how close these predictions are to reality at the end of the day Saturday!

As for the individual race, there it's much easier to be swayed by knowledge of the individuals involved. It looks like Steve Czupryna has the fastest time of any of the major contenders in Div. I, with Mark Amirault next, and Dave Polgar 3rd. However, the EMass runners are probably not going to repeat the slow, tactical opening mile of last Saturday's race. I would look for Brockton's Kevin Gill and Jose DePina to be much more aggressive. Here's how I predict the finish of Div I

1. Steve Czupryna Chicopee Comp.
2. Mark Amirault Xaverian
3. David Polgar Newton North
4. Kevin Gill Brockton
5. Ryan Collins Mansfield

Others close to the front: Jose DePina (Brockton), Robert Gibson (Brookline), Andrew Mulvaney (South Hadley), Adrian Kun (St. John's), Blake Marcus (Amherst), Matias Carrasco (Brookline)

November 15, 2005

All-States... Back in the Day

I grew up in Western Mass. and ran track and cross-country for Amherst H.S. in the mid-1970's. For me and the other guys on my team, the most thrilling day of the year was the Mass. All-State XC meet. The first year that I went was 1973 when I was a sophomore. We drove down with our coach the night before the meet and stayed in a motel in Quincy. I think it was the first time I had ever stayed in a hotel or motel in my life, and it was very exciting.

In those days (long before the Internet), nobody in EMass knew much about the runners from Western Mass., and likewise, we had only a vague idea of the good runners and teams from Eastern Mass. We felt the Boston papers pretty much ignored anything that happened west of Worcester and we were always anxious to prove ourselves on a bigger stage. The course we ran was at Franklin Park, but not on the White Stadium side of the road, but on the other side, down by the ball field. The race started in a low spot and climbed for 300-400m at the start. We ran along the perimeter of the golf course for a long time, before circling back near the start, climbing some steep hills, crossing the road, and finishing in front of White Stadium. It was not a particularly good course for spectators, but it was fair and challenging for the runners. I never knew exactly how long it was, but I have heard people say that it was 2.85 miles. I can tell you, it felt a lot longer.

Another thing that was different then was that All-States was a single race for all schools, regardless of size. If someone won the All-State meet, that was the end of the debate. The split into Division I and Division II didn't happen until around 1990.

In 1973, we were a pretty young team and we didn't fare too well at All-States. Our top runner, a sophomore, was 26th or so. I was 86th. Still, it was a great experience. The next year, 1974, we were much better, and I think we finished 5th overall. The funny thing is, I don't ever remember thinking we could win the All-State meet. One reason was that we always lost the Western Mass. meet to Springfield Cathedral, which was a power in those days. Our top three runners were good, perhaps as good as anyone's, but we never did have the depth of the bigger schools.

The 1974 Mass. State meet was significant because it pitted two future legends of the sport against each other. That year, Wayland junior Alberto Salazar ran an unbelievable time of 14:09 at the Catholic Memorial meet. In the state meet, he ran against Chicopee's Dan Dillon. The two of them raced far ahead of the rest of the field, with Dillon winning a furious sprint at the finish, setting a new course record 14:02, to Salazar's 14:04. Dillon would go on to make the USA's World XC Championship team seven times in his career, while Salazar would set a US best in the 10K and a world best in the marathon. As for me, I finished far back in ninth and never quite made it to the Olympics.

The 1975 state meet was my last with Amherst HS. It was kind of an anti-climax for me -- my season had been affected by various physical issues, and I finished 25th, well off what I thought I could do. Once again, we finished in about 5th or 6th. We did beat Cathedral at the State Meet, though, so that was good.

Salazar won easily in 1975, and went on to have a stellar career at the University of Oregon. Dillon went on to run at Providence College. I attended Reed College, which didn't have any varsity sports. It would be many years before I ran competitively again.

November 12, 2005

Alumni News - NCAA Regional results

We've been trying to keep tabs on NNHS alumni throughout the 2005 Collegiate XC season. On Saturday, NCAA Div. I, II, and III regional qualifying meets were held all around the country. Here's how former Newton North athletes fared:

In the NCAA Div III Northeast Region Meet, sophomore All-American Liz Gleason placed 6th overall with a time of 21:50.9 for 6K to help Williams College place first and gain an automatic bid to the Div III National Championships. Wesleyan freshman Anna Schindler placed 88th overall, and 5th for her team with a time of 24:12.3. Full results

In the NCAA Div III Atlantic Region, Dan Chebot, a freshman at the University of Rochester placed 74th overall, and 6th for his team, with a time of 27:18, as the host Yellow Jackets placed 4th out of 32 teams. Full results

In the NCAA Div III Great Lakes Regional Meet, Joni Waldron placed 132nd and 4th for Earlham College with a time of 24:27 for 6K. En route, Joni set a 20-second PR for 5K! Full results

In the NCAA Div I South Central Regional held in Waco Texas, Chris Barnicle placed 13th overall and 6th for Arkansas with a time of 31:31 for 10K. the The #1 ranked Razorbacks won the meat easily and qualified for the NCAA Div I Championships November 21. Full results

November 10, 2005

How to run the 5K at Franklin Park...

Running the 5K at the EMass championships is a real test, not only of phsyical fitness, but of mental concentration as well.

The problem faced by all runners is how to manage the pace on a course that tends to run very fast for the first mile and very slow thereafter. It is easy to get caught up in the nervous energy of the start and run close to your mile PR for the first mile, and then fade badly in the later stages of the race. But because there are so many runners in the race, it is also easy to get stuck in a bad spot early, and spend the race trying to make up for lost time. What's a runner to do?

Physiologically speaking, one of the most important things ANY runner can do is warm up properly, which means thoroughly. Warm muscles work more efficiently than un-warmed up muscles for aerobic tasks. Failing to warm up properly and then sprinting off at the beginning of the race forces the body to tap anerobic energy sources way too early, and leads to dead legs long before the final mile. Of all the races in the year, this one is the one you must concentrate on your warmup, with a 15-20 minute VERY EASY jog, followed by stretches, flexibility drills, and eventually 4-5 strides. In cold weather, runners should still strive to have broken a sweat by the time they line up for the race.

Ok, so after warming up properly, and lining up, what's the best strategy for the start? At Franklin Park, the start takes all of 20-25 seconds, as you cross Playstead field and then take a hard right onto the path that curves around White Stadium. The goal for the start is to run hard for about 10 seconds, and then relax into a steady, almost comfortable pace. Running the first ten seconds hard can improve your place when the pack finally comes together by 30-40 places, but it costs very little in terms of energy demands (IF you have warmed up properly!). After that, continuing to run harder than your normal race pace simply wastes energy that will be needed later. Besides, at this point the main goal is not to be running super fast, but to avoid getting tripped or trampled. I always make a mental note that if I'm still on my feet after a half mile, I've had a good start no matter where I am in the pack. And if you do go down in the early stages of the race, get up quickly but don't try to get back to where you were all at once. Be patient, and settl in for a bit before you start moving up again.

Having survived the start, and having settled into a steady but unspectacular pace, your main goal in the first mile is to monitor yourself and make sure your breathing is even and your arms and shoulders are relaxed. The pace will be quick, and your goal is to let the pack tow you along without pressing. It's likely that there will be people passing from behind. Don't be too bothered by this. Likewise, if you are passing people, try to make sure that it is because they are slowing down, not because you are riding a flood tide of nervous energy that is fooling you into going too fast. The first mile goes by quickly.

The second mile begins with a second turn past the stadium and then up and over Bear Cage Hill. Even if you feel pretty good and are getting itchy to pass people, it is usually a bad idea to charge up the hill at a much higher level of effort. At this point in the race, the goal is to increase effort slightly going up bear Cage, so that when you reach the flat part at the top you are not in need of a recovery. Try to quickly regain your normal pace over the top of the hill, and stay relaxed as you fly down the other side. When you hit the bottom of the hill, with all the screaming spectators, it's time to really focus on what lies ahead. The absolutely best place to pass people is the stretch from the bottom of Bear Cage, behind the start, past the finish line, and up the narrow lane just before the wilderness. If you have been running the race well, this is where you start going by runners who went out too fast. Ideally, you will simply be running your normal pace, and others will be fading, but if you feel that you have plenty of energy, this is not a bad place to try to increase the pace slightly and see how you feel. The two mile mark is about 100m past the finish line, as you take the right hand turn up the back lane between the stone walls.

And into the wilderness. Here, all your focus shuld be on running the course well -- by which I mean, keeping your stride cadence the same, cutting the tangents wherever possible, picking efficient lines through the curves, relaxing as you approach the tight turns, and accelerating out of them. The Wilderness is technical. You need to think like an Indy 500 Race car driver, or a downhill skier. The final turn out of the Wilderness is very tricky. Swing to the left before you hit the turn, relax, and then as soon as you have made the turn, work hard to get your stride back. At this point, you have about 2 minutes of running left.

The finish at Franklin is amazing, with everyone hitting Playstead Field and going crazy. Don't sprint too early, but don't save yourself either. I never want anyone to pass me once I hit the field, and will pretty much kill myself to maintain my position around the two backstops into the final straight. Once you hit that final straight, remember that you have arms for a reason, and use them to try to get a few more seconds out of your body as you come down the straight and into the chute. Try to focus on someone in front of you and just concentrate on beating that person. Every second is at least one place, you you can't stop racing until you are through the finish line.

And then you can relax... No, not really! In fact, you will be herded like a steer into a narrow chute with a hundred other exhausted, muddy runners, surpised to find yourself still alive. Enjoy the feeling! Years from now, you'll look back on these moments and there will be no mud, blood, snot, or sweat, only the sweet and pure memory of the effort.

That's it, the Franklin Park 5K course!

November 09, 2005

EMass Class Meet Predictions

After a strange, foggy excursion to the wilds of Wrentham last Saturday, it's back to Franklin Park November 12th for the EMass Championships (also known as the "Class Meets, because the schools run in four different divisions, or classes, based on the number of students enrolled in that school). The EMass meet is for the top seven varsity runners only, and is the qualifying meet for the State Championship to be held Nov. 19th.

On the boys side, David Polgar and Doug Brecher are hoping for top ten finishes in what is always one of the most competitive races of the year. Polgar finished 3rd last year in the snow, and would dearly love to improve on that. He'll have a race on his hands trying to handle Brockton's Kevin Gill and Jose DePina, Xaverian's Mark Amirault, and Haverhill's Pat Fullerton. Brecher might not be quite ready to run with that crowd, but he's not far behind. Other North varsity runners include senior Noah Jampol, who wants to go sub-17:00 in what seems likely to be his final HS cross-country race, Seb Putzeys, Charlie Krasnow, and Peter Sun. It is not known whether Ben Chebot will be able to run, but if not, the seventh spot will likely be taken by Tim Abbott.

As for qualifying, the top five teams in Division I move on to the State Meet. Realistically, NNHS has only a remote chance to make it. In a typical year, teams need to have all of their top five runners under 17:30 to have a chance to be in the top five teams. The teams in Div. I with the best chance to move on include Brockton, Cambridge, Methuen, Brookline, Chelmsford, and Haverhill. North has an outside shot, as does Newton South.

Strangely, it will be the first race of the year at Franklin Park for the North boys.

Not so the Newton North girls, who competed in the Bay State Invitational last month. Unlike the boys, the girls are definitely making a run at a State qualifying berth. The team is led by defending Div I State champion Jess Barton (2nd in the EMass meet last year) and by Junior returnee Haleigh Smith, who has been running well all year. But the future hopes of the Tigers will rest on their talented group of freshmen, including Carolyn Ranti, Adina Hemley-Bronstein, and Nora Barnicle. While I don't know for certain the seven runners who will be competing, other likely members of the team are Jackie Faneuil and Szeman Lam.

Teams that have a good shot at qualifying for States include Newton South, Newton North, Haverhill, Weymouth, Chelmsford, and Lincoln-Sudbury.

One thing that is a big variable is the condition of the Franklin Park course. As of last Sunday, footing was firm, but uneven. Previous races in the rain have left the surface chewed up and uneven. I would venture the opinion that course seems to favor strength runners over speed runners right now. That should be good news for Polgar and Barton.

November 07, 2005

At the State Coaches Meet

A heavy fog blanketed Newton Saturday morning, as two buses carrying the boys and girls XC teams set out from Hull St. bound for Wrentham. Wrentham? Yes, overcrowding and a deteriorating relationship with community groups forced MSTCA officials to relocate the State Coaches meet from its traditional home at Franklin Park to the Wrentham Development center, not far from Foxboro Stadium.

While the course itself got mixed reviewes, the organization of the meet was excellent, and the weather cooperated to provide a great day of racing. Shortly before the first race of the day, the fog lifted completely, revealing wide expanses of field and farm. If anything, temperature were probably a bit warm, but in spite of that, a large number of Newton runners set 5K PRs on the mostly flat course.

The downside was that the course was pretty much a bust for spectators, who were able to watch the start and the finish but nothing else. It is not known whether the MSTCA will consider the site for future meets of this size. We are all hoping that Franklin Park remains available to HS teams for big meets.

On to the runners: let's start with the NNHS freshmen girls, who ran to both an individual and team title in the Div I freshmen race. Carolyn Ranti made it two for two in state-level races, following up her Bay State Invite win with the MSTCA crown. Despite some stomach problems, Carolyn's time of 12:47.9 for 3K was nearly five seconds faster than runner-up Alix Gregory of Marshfield. Behind the leaders, Newton's pack ran brilliantly, placing three more runners in the top twenty. Nora Barnicle (12th, 13:47) finished second for the Tigers in a breakout race, while Adina Henley-Bronstein (16th, 14:00), and Maalika Banerjee (19th, 14:06) were right behind. Capping the Tiger's scoring was Sophie Dover (38th, 14:30).

In the boys freshmen race, Daniel Hamilton was the Tiger's top finisher, placing 23rd in 11:48. Adam Hollenberg (13:52) ran his best race of the season to place 2nd for the Tiger frosh, while Jason Luttmer (14:35), Jon Lee (14:46), and Dan Ackerman (15:37) also ran well.

In the boys sophomore race, North had its greatest depth, and rode that depth to a 9th place team finish (out of 21 teams). Seb Putzeys garnered 10th place in a personal best time of 17:40 for 5K. Tim Abbott (53rd, 18:38) was 2nd finisher for the Tigers, just missing out on a medal (given to the top 50). An ailing Ben Chebot still managed to run 19:20 to help the team's cause, but his quad injury obviously slowed him from his usual 18-minute pace. Charlie Krasnow (83rd, 19:25) finished 4th for the Tigers, and Mike Dorfman recorded a PR 19:56 to break 20 minutes for the first time and finish fifth on the team. A number of other sophomore boys recorded PRs or seasonal bests, including Isaac Bleicher (21:05), Chao He (21:10), Tommy Moriarty (21:53), and Ben Reedy (22:26).

In the boys junior/senior race, Doug Brecher opened with a 4:53 mile and continued to lead through two miles before being caught by Mansfield's Ryan Collins. Unwilling to yield another place, Brecher held off a late charge by another Mansfield runner, Dan Cerqueira, and finished 2nd overall in a gutsy PR of 16:25. Behind Brecher, Noah Jampol finished 23rd (17:27) to earn a medal. Rounding out the top five were Jean Merlet (PR 19:16), David Goldenberg (PR 19:20), and Dan Swartz (PR 19:39). After the top five, the PRs kepts coming, with Stephen Bandini (20:17), Chen Chen (20:29), and Gabe Gladstone (20:37) running well in their final meet of the year.

Now it's on to the EMass championship meet, but only for the top seven runners (and alternates) for the boys and girls team. To the JV runners who are now done, congratulations on a great season marked by tremendous improvements and new personal bests. I'm already looking forward to next Fall.

November 04, 2005

Peaking (2)

"Peaking" is the process of training to be at your very best -- to reach your "peak" -- when it matters most, typically in the last few races of the competitive season. There are few things as satisfying as running a personal best in a championship situation.

There are two things you should know about peaking:

1. Peaking has both physical and a psychological aspects

2. Peaking sounds easy. But it isn't... trust me.

This is not to say that there isn't a reputable science of peaking, at least of peaking physically. In the 1970's, a physiologist named David Costill did a number of studies of collegiate swimmers. Costill's work showed beyond a doubt that when a period of intense training was followed by a period of recovery, athletes recorded their best times. In essence, that's all peaking is: training followed by recovery. The difficulty lies in knowing how much training and how much recovery is optimal.

In the 1950's, Arthur Lydiard developed a training regimen for a group of New Zealand runners who went on to achieve worldwide fame and Olympic Glory. Lydiard preached the benefits of large quantities of aerobic (low intensity) training, for a period of six months or more, followed by a relatively short period during which the athlete ran hill workouts, and then speedworkouts. The success of Lydiard's athletes was like a bombshell in the athletic world, and almost every distance runner now incorporates some form of Lydiard's methods in their training plans.

Perhaps the greatest example of Lydiard-style peaking was achieved by Lasse Viren, the great Finnish runner who won the 5000m and 10,000m in the 1972 Olympics, and then repeated the feat in the 1976 Olympics. Viren was highly unusual in that he never ran particularly impressive times in non-Olympic years, preferring to do nothing but build a base of high mileage. When the Olympics rolled around, he would reduce his mileage, begin doing structured speed workouts, and destroy his competition. The patience of the man is still astounding.

Before Lydiard, the conventional wisdom was that athletes needed to do speedwork throughout the year, and lots of it at all times. Even after Lydiard, not all coaches or athletes bought into the Lydiard system. This opposition was famously captured in the aphorism "Long, slow distance makes long, slow runners." There is some truth to this, and it's helpful to remember that Lydiard's athletes did their running in the very hilly terrain of New Zealand. Since all the runs were done on hills, they were not exactly easy runs. An athlete training with Lydiard would spend their Sundays running a 22-mile loop through the steep hills around Auckland at better than 6:30/mile pace. After six months of that, you bet his runners were fit!

They were also supremely confident, and this brings me to the second aspect of peaking, and the one that is most difficult to control. Peaking means being ready not only physically, but mentally as well. Ideally, the athlete's mental state reaches a peak of confidence and eagerness as the important races approach. But this is easier said than done! First of all, a lot of runners derive their sense of confidence from their last hard workout. For a runner like that, resting too much can wreck havoc on their belief in their abilities. It only takes a few days before the "edge" starts wearing off, and worries start setting in. Second, training well is a matter of routine and rhythm, and when one disrupts the rhythm (even to get some well-deserved rest), results are not always what one hopes.

The real key to peaking is to believe in both the training and the recovery, and this belief only comes about through absolute trust of a coach, or a trust in yourself developed over years of successful peaking.

Are there guidelines to follow? Sure. For one thing, don't expect to peak too often. If you think you can peak every couple of weeks, you're talking about something else, not peaking. A true peak is the result of a long buildup that allows the body to adapt to a significantly higher level of training. If you started training three weeks ago, don't worry about peaking any time soon... I generally try to arrange my training to peak twice a year: once in the Fall (October/early November) and once in the late Winter (March). In April, I start over again with a long buildup that lasts four-five months. It might seem like a long time to do nothing but train, but the broader the base, the higher the peak.

Another guideline is to be judicious in the use of anaerobic work. The thing is, some anaerobic repetition work is useful for a distance runner. However, it can be counter-productive to do too much of this type of work, since it is physically and mentally demanding and has diminishing returns compared with say, aerobic capacity work. What prevents you from running faster at 5K is your ability to use oxygen, not your ability to run without oxygen, as you would do in a 400-meter dash.

While SOME speedwork can be useful year round, in the early stages of a buildup, speedwork should take a backseat.

November 03, 2005

Peaking (1)

One of the most vexing question for any runner or coach is how to be at one's best for the biggest meets. Everyone has an opinion about how much work to do in the final weeks and days leading up to a big race, and often these opinions differ a great deal. Another question that is fiercely debated is how many races to run, and whether to limit the number of races within a competitive season.

Before I offer MY opinion on these issues, let's consider the NNHS season...

Official practice begins the week before Labor Day. This year, the first day of practice was August 29th. The first race, a tri-meet against Needham and Framingham, took place 15 days later on September 13. Including that first meet, the other seven dual meets, the league meet, and the State Coaches meet on Nov. 5th, there have been 10 scheduled meets in 54 days; one meet every 5.5 days. That doesn't count two fixtures in the calendar, the Brown Invitational (North's boys varsity ran there on Oct 8) and the Bay State Invitational (North's girls ran there on Oct. 1). That makes 11 meets in 54 days, more than one meet every 5 days.

So what's wrong with that? Aren't meets opportunities to get faster and get more experience racing? Why shouldn't we take the attitude that the more meets, the better? Well, some coaches DO take that attitude.

And some don't. The ones who don't counter-argue that too much racing a) cuts into the time available for building up endurance, as well as muscle and tendon strength for injury prevention, and b) leads to mental staleness and a lack of racing success at just the point when mental freshness is needed.

What makes this argument hard to decide is that different runners react differently to the stresses of training and racing. Also, runners sometimes skip races, or take them very easily. This is a luxury that the NNHS teams have enjoyed for years. The Tiger have many meets a year in which thet are so much better than their rivals that they can rest (i.e., train) their top runners, or just run relaxed and still win. For most of his Senior year, Chris Barnicle trained right through races without easing up on his other workouts, or running particularly hard in the meets. He wanted to save his best for the biggest meets. It's common practice among the better runners in the state. On the other hand, too little racing runs the risk of leaving runners less than sharp for the competitive pressures of racing. It's a really fine line, and the placement of that line is not the same for every runner.

I said I would offer my opinion: I think there are too many races squeezed into a short season, with inadequate pre-season for building up endurance and strength. It is maddening to me to have otherwise healthy teenagers waylaid with so many preventable injuries. But the occurrence of the injuries is predictable: they are the result of building up mileage and speedwork too quickly, without adequate time for the tendons and ligaments and muscles to get used to a higher training load.

I would argue that XC runners should, on average, race no more than once a week, skipping some weeks entirely. This is what almost all colleges do. Why do HS runners race far more often than college runners?

Among other things, racing less often allows a coach and a team to implement a true peaking strategy for the big races. In my next post I'll talk about what such a strategy might look like.

November 01, 2005

Racing... (It's not like training)

"Training was a rite of purification; from it came speed, strength. Racing was a rite of death; from it came knowledge." - John L. Parker, Once a Runner

I was thinking about the BSL meet over the weekend, wondering why some runners seem to rise to the occasion in big races, while others seems to run better in practice than they do when the pressure is on.

A few minutes before the boys varsity race, I mentioned to Noah Jampol that I didn't think a particular kid on Weymouth was going to run well, despite having beaten Noah in a dual meet and established himself as a favorite to crack the top twelve. Sadly, my prediction was borne out, as this kid finished 20th, well back of runners he had beaten handily during the season.

On the other hand, Noah ran extremely well, staying right with a pack of Brookline runners who had beaten him soundly only three days before.

As I pondered this, I made a list in my mind of things I have learned do NOT predict racing success in a big meet:


  • Running impressive workouts the week before a race
  • Running fast in races of negligible importance
  • Running poorly in races of negligible importance


All the predictions made by all the most knowledgable observers can only approximate the dynamics that determine the result when very good runners race each other. On race day, at the appointed time, what matters most is whether an athlete is ready for the test. If they are truly ready in mind and body then the course (and its Brookline-esque hills) doesn't matter. Snow doesn't matter. The shouts of spectators don't even register. But if the athlete isn't ready, then all these things -- course, hills, weather, crowd -- become obstacles.

On the day of the league meet, there were surprises. Not all fast runners, ran fast or well. Not all undefeated teams remained undefeated. The races were not decided by taking a poll of what the coaches thought would happen. Thank goodness! Race day was more elemental than that: let's race and see who gets to the finish line first.

I think it's possible to learn how to develop "racing mind" that quality that allows you to do your best on the day it matters. Look at Doug Brecher, who has not always had his best races in his biggest races. He was ready on Saturday. It might not have been comfortable for his coches to see him cavorting with the Brookline kids, but he was clearly looking forward to the race, and that's a big part of being ready.

Ultimately, a runners needs to accept that the race will be a test, but not dwell on it. There's a fine line between wanting to perform well and fearing the consequences of performing poorly. When I prepare to race, I try to focus on the importance of gaining the self-knowledge that the race brings. If I do my best, I will learn something of great value, regardless of where I finish, or what my time is. I have learned valuable things from races in which I have run poor times. I don't disown those eforts.

As a coach, I know that I am responsible for designing a training plan that helps runners become fit enough to run races. But I'm also responsible for training my athletes to race, which is a different thing.

October 31, 2005

Alumni News - Oct 29

Another fine race for Newton North alumna Liz Gleason at the NESCAC championships, held Saturday Oct 29 at Middlebry College. Liz ran a PR 18:21 for 5K to finish 5th overall, and second for Williams, which won the women's championship. In the same race, Anna Schindler ran a season's best 20:05 to place 66th, and 5th for Wesleyan.

Ciaran O'Donovan ran in the open 5K race and placed 9th in 18:00.

Also on Saturday, Chris Barnicle ran in the SEC championships. Arkansas won the team championships, but Chris, still hampered by a foot injury, finished in 50th place (25:01), well back of his usual position in the Arkansas pack.

Dan Chebot continued to play a key role for the University of Rochester XC team, placing 36th overall and 5th on his team at the UAA Championships held in Pittsburgh on Saturday. Dan ran 26:54 for the 8K course.

At the NCAC Conference Championships, Earlham senior Joni Waldron ran 26:10 for 6K, finishing 47th overall and fifth for her team.

October 30, 2005

At the League Meet...

In a lot of ways, the Bay State League meet is my favorite XC race of the year. It always feels to me like just the right mix of friendly interaction and fierce competition among the twelve schools. Every year, teams come to the league meet knowing it is basically their last chance to acheive status in the league. Often a team or an individual has a score to settle: a chance to reverse the outcome of a close meet, or make up for a bad race earlier in the season.

The league meet is the conclusion and culmination of the league season. After this, there are the big meets, but the teams are scattered across the different divisions and don't necessarily face each other any more. And in the really big meets like the EMass Divisional championships, no team can afford to focus on any single rival. All of this means that the league meet is a unique occasion to look back and look forward, to assess the teams relative to previous years, and to speculate on what next year's league will look like.

On Saturday, we saw Jess Barton run like the defending state champion she is. Running against Wellesley's Brielle Chabot (who had beaten Barton by 53 seconds at Walpole), Barton took the lead at the start and refused to let the race get tactical. Chabot is nothing if not tough, and she hung on and hung on, but couldn't close the gap and get contact. It was a superb effort by Barton and erased any doubts about her ability to do well in the big meets ahead.

Wellesley won the girls team competition, but Newton avenged a home loss to Weymouth, beating the Wildcats by two points. It must have been a bitter pill to swallow for the Weymouth girls, who entered the meet undefeated and were anxious to prove that they were as good as their record. Becca MacDonald ran a game race to finish 4th overall, and Weymouth's second and third runners were 13th and 14th, but their dominant pack didn't perform as well as they had against Newton and Wellesley. It wouldn't have mattered, except Newton's freshman class, and in particular Nora Barnicle and Adina Henley-Bronstein, ran their best races of the year to place 26th and 29th, respectively. Looking forward, one might also note that Newton North's top five are all underclassmen so presumably they'll all be back next year.

In 2004, Wellesley was by far the dominant girls team. Not only did they place four runners in the the top five in the varsity race, they swept the first six places in the JV race. This year they came back to earth, and it looks like 2005 will feature close competition between Newton, Wellesley, Weymouth, and Natick.

In the boys varsity race, a lot went according to form, but there were also some surprises. For the fourth year in a row, a Newton North boy won the individual league championship. For the third time in four years, Newton North boys went 1-2 (the other year, they went 1-3). Brookline reclaimed the team title after three years of Newton North dominance. Brookline placed five runners in the top 12, a feat that Newton North accomplished in 2003 and 2004.

One of the great sub-plots to the race was the battle between Newton North and Wellesley for second-place team. Wellesley, you will recall, ended Newton North's five-year streak of consecutive dual meet wins by racing them to a tie at Walpole, and winning the tie-breaker on the performance of their sixth man. The league meet was just as close, but with the edge going to Newton. Unlike at Walpole, Brecher was able to use his strength to defeat the speedier Charlie Meade. Meanwhile, Noah Jampol beat last year's all-scholastic Tom Mayell and the rest of the Wellesley pack. The fate of the Tigers lay in the legs of Seb Putzeys and first-year XC runner Peter Sun, who had confided before the race, "I really don't feel like running today..." But Seb and Peter came through for 25th and 32nd, and that proved to be just enough to shake Wellesley out of second place. Ben Chebot and Charlie Krasnow also ran tough races, but Ben has been battling injuries and struggled to finish 39th in 17:45. Charlie finished 48th in 18:01.

Interestingly, if the boys' race was scored as a dual meet between Newton and Wellesley, the results come out like this:


NNHS Wellesley
1 3
2 5
4 6
10 7
12 8
-- --
29 29



And... it's a tie! In this scenario, Wellesley would win the tie-break again, and the frustration for Newton North would go on...

I guess, all in all, it's a good thing we have the rest of the league!

October 27, 2005

Random thoughts...

Why is it that Brookline always has such a good boys team, and rarely has a good girls team? The boys race at yesterday's meet was great, with four really strong runners battling throughout, and David Polgar taking the victory only 2 seconds off the course record. The girls race was boring, with Newton winning easily. Brookline didn't even field a complete team for the varsity girls race. What's up with that?

Brookline's sophomore class (boys) is really, really good. Robert Gibson, Mike Burnstein, and Eliot Lehane are the nucleus of a Brookline team that will be formidable through 2007.

Thanks to all who have left comments on previous posts. I really appreciate them! Unfortunately, I have also started receiving comment spam (automated comments with links to commercial web sites). To keep the blog free of this stuff, I've turned on "word verification." All this means is that when you leave a comment, you'll need to read a word from the screen and type it into a verification field. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Ben Chebot missed the Brookline meet because of a music trip. Don't worry, Ben, you'll get another chance to run the Larz Anderson course October 23rd, 2007. Unless the meet is postponed. Let me check the weather forecast.... no, you're good to go that day.

The League meet is on Saturday. The girls race has been the subject of some serious trash-talking between partisans of Wellesley and Weymouth. The Wellesley girls want to revenge their loss to Weymouth during the regular season (a loss in which they were missing their #1 and #3 runners). The individual race will be exciting, with Jess Barton getting another shot at Brielle Chabot. Newton North girls have finished second for the past three years. Can Barton break through and win the individual title?

The boys race will be the deepest in years, with runners from Brookline, Wellesley, Newton, and Weymouth dominating. Needham should also have one or two runners in the top 15. Brookline is aiming to have six in the top twelve, which would surpass Newton's record of 6 in the top 13 from two years ago. Brookline should win the team race easily, but Newton vs. Wellesley will be very close. Again.

Yesterday Wellesley beat Needham 21-36. Wellesley's Charlie Meade and Tom Mayell went 1-2 in 12:43 and 12:50, respectively. There is NO WAY that they ran exactly the same course that North ran against Natick.

Yesterday, someone mentioned to me that the Needham coach should be boys coach of the year. If I had a vote (which I don't) I would vote for Needham senior Charles Beard, who got his team to run all summer. The results speak for themselves.

Not to look too far ahead, but the organizational meeting for boys indoor track is Monday Oct. 31 after school. The meeting for girls indoor track is Thursday Nov. 3 after school.

October 26, 2005

Farewell to Tuesday nights

Yesterday's meet at Brookline was postponed, as expected, and will be held today instead. With rain still falling this morning, it promises to be a very soggy affair. The forecast looks considerably better for the league meet on Saturday.

On a personal note, last night marked the final Tuesday night outdoor track workout of the season for me. From mid April to the end of October Tuesday nights mean workouts at the Harvard Track with my running club. But on Sunday morning, Daylight Savings Time will end, darkness will descend on the afternoon commute, and we'll move indoors. In case there was any doubt, another summer will be over.

The rhythm of the Tuesday night workout is deeply ingained in my running psyche, and the familiarity and routine helps me get through a lot tough runs in all kinds of weather. Last night was no exception. Normally, there would be dozens of runners doing intervals of various sorts, but last night the track was empty except for me, my training buddy Terry, and one other soul fighting the gusts of rain and wind that plagued the far turn of the track. We warmed up for about twenty minutes, becoming increasingly water-logged. After four strides, we switched to our lightweight shoes, peeled off multiple layers of wet clothing, and got into it.

The night's workout was 2 x 1000, 4 x 600, 4 x 400, all with a 200m jog recovery (about 1:30-2:00). Terry set the pace for the opening 1000 felt hard, but turned out to be pretty slow as we fought the wind and the puddles that had gathered on the inside lane of the track. To avoid the spray off Terry's shoes, I ran slightly to his outside, which exposed me more to the wind. I led the second 1000, which was a couple of seconds faster, but still much slower than what we had been running on previous weeks.

Whew, it was tough to work against the wind resistance, especially on the homestretch! We dug into the 600s trying to maintain about the same pace or a little faster than the 1000s. The first one (with Terry leading) felt ok. The second one (with me leading) felt hard. The third one (with Terry leading) felt ok again. Every interval now fell into the same pattern -- the opening 200 felt good with the wind pushing us down the backstretch, helping stretch out our cramped strides; then the second 200 would be a struggle to maintain pace and form in the teeth of the gale, then the final 200 much harder than it should be. I led the fourth 600, and was glad when it was over.

Into the 400s, trying to run them a bit faster than the 1000s and 600s. Each one felt hard, but now the 200 rest in between intervals seemed generous. I broke the pattern and led the 2nd and 3rd, figuring that Terry would run faster than me on the last one, and he did. It was our fastest interval of the night, and as I trailed him across the finish, I was glad to have it over.

It was a challenge to get our warm clothes and gloves back on, but we managed, and then shared a damp and sodden cooldown -- 14-15 minutes jogging around the Harvard Satdium complex, reminiscing about the crappy weather we had run through this year. Spring had been too cold, summer too hot, and late October too wet -- all in all, another typical New England outdoor season.

The leaves fall, the clocks are turned back, and now we move our track workouts to the indoor boards. That can only mean that summer is truly over and snowstorms are right around the corner. Around and around we go, around the narrow oval to the rhythm of the seasons... Like a flock of migrating birds, such is the life of the competitive runner.

October 25, 2005

Siiiinging in the rain...

Here it is Tuesday morning and it's blowing a gale out there. The traffic in to work was heavy but no worse than many mornings. I'm guessing there's no meet this afternoon, but it will probably be a while before I get the official word from the school.

It seems like a good day to run -- maybe not a good day to race, but a good day to run. There's just something about running in wildly inclement weather that feels satisfying, bracing, and good for one's confidence. It's also a good chance to enjoy a little solitude, away from the fair weather joggers, dog walkers, strollers, and other pedestrians that dot the landscape on milder days. Plus, whatever difficulties one feels running in weather like this are temporary and soon forgotten. The positive feelings of being resilient enough to get out there when no one else is out there last for a lot longer. And you know, And months from now when you are looking back at your training log, you don't want to see a zero staring at you from the day when there was a little rain and wind.

I remember running an XC race in a Nor'easter one year. The race was held in the Middlesex Fells in late October and was put on by a local running club with no sponsorship, no t-shirts, no prizes to speak of, and hardly any publicity. Much like today, New England was getting a couple of inches of rain and high winds from an off-shore storm. The race was on a Sunday, and the roads were empty as I drove to the Fells. When I got there, a couple of officials were standing around and you could tell they were wondering whether to cancel the race. It turned out that several parts of the course were underwater. In one spot, we had to run through a puddle that was about a foot deep in the middle. On another section of the trail, a small river had formed from the rainwater running down the hill. Jogging around before the race was no fun; by the time we were ready for the race, we were pretty much as wet as we were going to be. There were about 30 runners altogether, and in our numbers we found additional strength of will. Once the race got started it was fun. It was as though the pack of runners regressed to a more primitive state, all animal instincts and animal feelings as we ploshed about in the woods. I fell once on a grassy turn, but I was up again before I knew it and almost made me laugh.

On that day, a number of larger races around New England were cancelled. Our little race was not cancelled, and I think it's because those few of us who showed up felt a collective sense of adventure that overrode our more cautious side. Like everyone else, we started out hesitant and unsure of ourselves, but with every muddy ditch we navigated, with every stream we splashed through, we felt better and better about ourselves. There wasn't ANYTHING we couldn't handle.

If you never get out and run in a cold drenching rain like today, you miss something. Maybe it's something you don't care to experience, and I respect that. But I feel that from time to time, it's worth a little discomfort to let your wild animal side out of its cage and roam around for a bit. As the remnants of the hurricane pass through the area, if you venture outside and listen very carefully, you might just hear weird howls in the distance, barely distinguishable above the whipping of the wind. That's the sound of the really crazy runners singing in the rain.

October 24, 2005

Watching the Weather Again

The final dual meet of the season is scheduled for Tuesday at Brookline, but a quick check of the weather forecast casts doubt on the chances of the meet taking place without a postponement. On Monday Morning, the forecast is for temperatures in the upper 40s, with periods of rain and winds gusting 35-50 mph.

If the meet is not held Tuesday, it seems likely that both schools would try to squeeze it in on Wednesday, 10/25. That's not the best situation because the BSC League meet is on Saturday, so there will be little time to rest and recover from what figures to be an all-out effort against the Warriors. At least all the BSC teams will be dealing with the same issue.

Besides Brookline v. Newton North, another good meet will be Needham v. Wellesley at Wellesley's home course. In what might be referred to as a "Run of the Charles," Wellesley's Charlie Meade takes on Needham's Charles Beard. I pick Wellesley, but it should be a battle.

Although it's early to be looking at the weather for the weekend, it looks like we might luck out and have a beautiful fall day for the league meet. Last year's league meet was held on the same day as the Red Sox World Seres Championship Parade, decimating the ranks of our boys JV team. What a long time ago that seems!

October 23, 2005

Alumni News from Oct 15 and 22

Let's catch up on the exploits of Newton North alumni.

Liz Gleason ran a PR 18:26 for 5K to place 5th overall for Williams at the Little Three Championships held in Williamstown, Mass. on October 22. Williams won the team title easily over Amherst and Wesleyan. Liz has solidified her position as the 3rd runner for the defending NCAA Div III National Champions. Other local runners in the same race included Newton South alumna Caitlin McDermott-Murphy (Amherst), Norwood H.S. alumna Lisa Davenport (Williams), and former Danvers H.S. standout Heather Wilson.

Scott Cole is at Skidmore College in upstate New York where he has been taking a break from competitive bike racing to run as an unattached competitor at area road and XC races (Skidmore does not have a cross-country or trcak team). On Oct 16, Scott set a PR 17:55 for 5K XC at the Saratoga National Bank Cross Country Classic, finishing 20th overall and 2nd in his age group. In that race, Scott hung out with 2004 Footlocker finalists Nicole Blood and Caitlin Lane for a while before chivalry took over and he let them go first. On Saturday Oct 22 Scott took to the roads, running another PR 17:31 at the Great Pumpkin Challenge 5K in Saratoga, NY.

Dan Chebot was 21st at the 2005 Yellowjacket Cross Country Invitational hosted by the University of Rochester on Oct. 15th. Dan ran 27:23 for 8K and was fifth man for his team.

Earlham College senior Joni Waldron ran a season's best 21:33 for 5K to finish 38th overall and third for her team at the Wilmington College Fall Classic on Oct. 14th.

Jason Abbott-Dalamora ('03) ran 31:42 for 8K at Van Cortland Park while competing for University of New Haven in the NYCAC Championship meet.

Kat Chiong notes that Azuree Catledge ('05) is running XC for Howard University. I found one result on Howard's web site but I'm not sure if there have been any recent races for Azuree.

Univ. of Arkansas freshman Chris Barnicle suffered a minor setback on Oct. 15th when a foot injury forced him to drop out of the 10K XC race at the Chile Pepper Invitational in Fayetteville, Arkansas.

It was good to see Brandeis teammates Clayton Lloyd (NNHS '05) and Tim Condon (Weymouth H.S. '04) at the Weymouth-Newton North dual meet on Oct. 18th. We will assume that Clay enjoyed the run home more than Tim.

Do you know of any other NNHS alumni making news in the running world? Please leave a comment and a link to results.

October 22, 2005

With friends like these...

"As soon as one makes peace with hills, they do get easier. They become like a friend who always tells you the truth." – Patti Catalano Dillon (2005)

A few of us ran at Larz Anderson Park this morning. It's a lovely spot, and the view from the top of the ridge of the Boston skyline is quite stunning.

Brookline's course is very hilly. So what? It's a good course that challenges you in many ways. First, it requires patience. On many courses, the penalty for going too fast at the beginning is slowing down a little at the end. At Larz Anderson, the penalty for rushing up the hills with too much gusto is to kill your race. The oxygen debt incurred is too great, and recovery is impossible. Second, it requires courage. It's not helpful to dwell on the imagined difficulties of the course, but simply trust that training is sufficient, and you don't have to find the hills easy, just a little easier than the person running next to you.

There's an XC race I run pretty much every Fall that's held at Bradley Palmer State Park in Topsfield. It's also very hilly and I always look forward to it because I can beat people who are better than me on flat courses but have difficulty lugging themselves up the hills.

I like Patti Catalano's quote because it suggests to me that, as runners, we are constantly in need of someone or something to shake us out of our comfort zone. Hills do that with alarming efficiency. There's no coasting up a hill.

I have a training partner who likes to simulate hills by throwing surges into the middle of his 800's and 1000's during track workouts. It's tough to sprint for 200m and then settle right back into a fast 1000, but it teaches the same readiness that hills teach.

The meet is On Tuesday. Let's hope our friends, the hills, won't have unpleasant truths to tell.

October 20, 2005

Brookline, Brookline...

I'll go out on a limb and say that the Newton North girls will beat the Brookline girls next Tuesday, and finish the season at 9-2. At the league meet, Jess Barton will win -- ending a three-year string of second-place finishes for Tiger girls (Liz Gleason in '02 and '03, and Barton in '04).

Ah, but the boys meet against Brookline will more interesting.

It might seem that Brookline has already won the psychological battle. As the Newton North boys were handling Weymouth with relative ease, Brookline was humiliating a very good Wellesley team at Larz Anderson Park. Brookline had the first five finishers against Wellesley, and seven of the top ten. Charlie Meade, who was only five seconds behind David Polgar at Walpole, was humbled by the hills at Larz Anderson.

Much has been made of Brookline's home-course advantage. As evidence, all you need to do is consider the dramatic turnaround from last year to this between the two teams. In 2004, Brookline ran at Wellesley's 2.5 mile flat course. Both teams had basically the same personnel, and Wellesley put six runners in front of Brookline's second (Matias Carrasco went off-course while in the lead, so technically Wellesley took the top six places). A year later at Brookline's 2.65 mile hilly course, Brookline placed five in front of Wellesley's first (Brookline's 5th runner missed a turn and was disqualified for cutting the course, although he certainly would have beaten Meade).

A home-course advantage consists of knowing a course and how to run it, as well as being prepared physically for its rigors. Few runners actually practice running downhill, and if Brookline has an advantage in preparation, it is that they have had a lot of practice running downhill. Opponents try to run the uphills at Larz Anderson Park hard, but the Brookline kids know that one has to run the uphills easy, and then accelerate across the top of the hill. Running downhill is a matter of technique and confidence, and the Warriors believe they can make up any deficit they might have incurred on the uphill by running a better downhill.

But before we join Doug Brecher in throwing in the towel on behalf of the Tigers, let's pause to remember that two years ago North beat Brookline on its home course, by running a batter tactical race than the host team. On that day Chris Barnicle, Pat Pierce, and Dan Chebot held back early, resisted the temptation to charge up the hills in a rush of fear and adrenaline, and cooly destroyed the Brookline pack on the downhill sections of the course. That was also the day that Clayton Lloyd gave the first indication that he would be something special, as he came from 9th to 6th in the final 1000 meters of the race. It can be done.

NNHS v. Brookline 10/21/2003


1. Barnicle NN 15:56
2. Pierce NN 16:00
3. Chebot, D. NN 16:02
4. Carrasco B 16:16
5. Housman B 16:25
6. Lloyd NN 16:27
7. Okrochkov B 16:31
8. Kaye B 16:34
9. Rowe B 16:36
10. Polgar NN 16:57
11. Kaufman NN 17:01
12. Ewenstein B 17:30
13. Hessney B 17:34
14. McLoughlin NN 17:52
15. Smith NN 18:02
16. Jampol NN 18:06
17. Merlet, R. NN 18:13
18. Chebot, J. NN 18:24
19. Prakash NN 19:24


Sure, Brookline is good, maybe they are the best. But they still have to run the race, and Newton North will give them a better fight than Wellesley did.

October 19, 2005

History in the Making

It has been a great cross-country season for history buffs, as teams from Wellesley, and Weymouth have done things unthinkable only a few years before. Yesterday was no exception, as Weymouth's Lady Wildcats ended a lifetime curse by beating the perpetually great Newton North girls 28-30.

It was a strange meet in the sense that the Weymouth team resembled all those great Newton teams of the past, teams that won with relentless pack running and an endless supply of good runners to displace other teams' #4 and #5 runners. I well remember a meet I watched in 2000 in which Brookline took 1-2-4 against North and the Tigers won by taking the next six places. It was like that yesterday, as Jess barton, Haleigh Smith, and Carolyn Ranti took places 1-3-4, and then Weymouth opened the floodgates, taking the next five spots. Hall of Fame coach Peter Martin must have wondered where was that one senior to shore up the second pack and help the freshmen bridge the gap to the Weymouth pack.

But give credit to Weymouth -- they won with a team approach and placed eight runners before Newton North's 5th.

The boys meet was also thrilling, but with a happier outcome for the host Tigers. From the first moments of the race, it was obvious that the Weymouth boys were using the same game plan as the Weymouth girls: concede the individual win, but use superior numbers to pack in six finishers before North's #4 and #5. But Weymouth didn't fully appreciate the maturity and race acumen of North's underclassmen -- especially sophomore Seb Putzeys and Ben Chebot, and junior Peter Sun.

The race went out very fast, with David Polgar taking a rare turn at the front and hitting the mile in 4:53. Doug Brecher was holding on for dear life at 5:01, with Joe Ruvido, Sean Coleran, and Noah Jampol in a tight pack nearly twenty seconds back. Then another gap of 10-15 seconds, and another pack of three Weymouth runners, Putzeys, and Chebot. The Weymouth kids looked strained, the North kids looked comfortable. At halfway, nothing significant had changed except that Weymouth now had only two kids running with Putzeys and Chebot, and Peter Sun was moving up through the pack. It turned out that Weymouth's fourth man, Alex Bober, had to drop out with achilles tendonitis, but even had he finished with their third man, it wouldn't have made a difference.

Weymouth's fate was all but sealed when Jampol outkicked Ruvido in a 38-second PR of 17:04. It was a big-time race -- fast but under control -- from Jampol, who said his farewell to Cold Spring Park in memorable fashion. Forty seconds later, Putzeys came in 7th, and Chebot outkicked Weymouth's John Connolly for 8th. Whe Peter Sun (PR 18:04) placed 10th, Newton had done what Weymouth had wanted to do, put six runners ahead of the other team's 5th.

A few other notes: Polgar remains the only runner, male or female, in the BSC to be undefeated this year in dual meets. Polgar's 16:18 and Brecher's 16:31 were the 6th and 10th fastest times on the Cold Spring course in the last five years. Sean Coleran just missed becoming the 5th non-NNHS runner to break 17:00 on the course in that period. Jess Barton's 18:57 was one second slower than her best time from last year. Jess ran comfortably for the final 100 meters or would have certainly improved her time. As it is, she becomes the first girl ever to break 19 minutes twice on the course.

How would the 2005 boys team compare with the undefeated 2001 team? Coincidentally, Tuesday's meet was held on the four year anniversary of the final home meet of the 2001 season. Here's a comparison of North's top eight finishers from 2001 and 2005:


2001 2005
Barnicle 16:58 Polgar 16:18
Heidlage 17:29 Brecher 16:31
O'Donovan 17:32 Jampol 17:04
Burkly 17:33 Putzeys 17:50
Ronfard 17:38 Chebot 17:59
Pierce 17:54 Sun 18:04
Robb 17:56 Krasnow 18:24
Lichtmann 18:00 Abbott 18:36


So the 2005 team would take places 1-2-4-9-12 vs 3-5-6-7-8 resulting in... a 28-29 win!

October 17, 2005

NNHS v. Weymouth

This is FUN!

Another great meet this Tuesday, as the undefeated (9-0) Weymouth girls travel to Newton to take on the 8-1 Tigers at Cold Spring Park. The Weymouth girls have never beaten Newton North in cross-country. Not ever. Is this the year it will finally happen?

I think the meet will be very close, but I think North will win in an upset. It might seem illogical to think that Newton North, who were overrun by Wellesley, could beat Weymouth, who won handily against Wellesley, but that's the way I see it. When Weymouth beat Wellesley, Wellesley was missing their #1 and #3 runners. And the race was at a flat, fast 2.5M course.

At Cold Spring Park, I think a healthy Jess Barton will beat Becca MacDonald. After that, Haleigh Smith and Carolyn Ranti will have to go 3-4 against Weymouth's Nicole Pearce and Kristin Mahoney. Then it's up to the veterans (Szeman Lam and Jackie Faneuil) and the new kids (Adina Henley-Bronstein and Liz Altieri) to break up Weymouth's formidable pack. Here's how I see it:

NN Wey
1 2
3 5
4 6
9 7
10 8

27-28 Newton North.

And, with all due respect to Weyouth coach Mike Miller, I think that Peter Martin will have the best possible game plan going into the race to use the Cold Spring Park to his team's advantage. Whatever happens, it will be exciting to watch two of the top BSC teams battle it out for the Carey Division title.

Oh yeah, the boys meet should be a great one, too! Weymouth is 7-2 this year, with its only two losses to Wellesley and Brookline. And are they hungry to beat Newton North? It would absolutely make their season a success to pull off the upset. Believe it, Weymouth will be jacked up for this meet.

On paper, Newton North looks stronger. It would be a major surprise if North's duo of David Polgar and Doug Brecher don't totally run away from Weymouth's Joe Ruvido and Sean Coleran. After that, it gets a little more interesting. Noah Jampol is strong enough to finish 5th, maybe even better, and then Ben Chebot and Seb Putzeys should be better than Weymouth's 5th runner. Here's the way I project the score:

NN Wey
1 3
2 4
5 6
7 8
9 10

NN 24 - Weymouth 31

The course should be a little drier this Tuesday than it was last week. And it's the last home meet ever for Polgar, Brecher, and Jampol.

It will be a blast!

October 16, 2005

Brown Invite Results

Full results here.

Newton North without Seb Putzeys finished 17th of 22 teams, ahead of Lincoln-Sudbury, St. John's Prep, and Barnstable, and behind Brockton, Amherst, Brookline, and Xaverian.

Individual Results:

10. David Polgar 16:30
24. Doug Brecher 16:54
125. Noah Jampol 18:22
142. Peter Sun 18:53
150. Ben Chebot 19:12
151. Charlie Krasnow 19:14

At the Brown Invite

As late as 9:30 Saturday morning, the NNHS Boys varsity XC team wasn't sure they were actually going to drive down to East Greenwich, RI, for the Championship Race at the Brown HS Invitational. The rain had been heavy overnight, reports from the course indicated huge puddles and mud, and several teams had already dropped out.

At the last moment, the decision was made to run, but Seb Putzeys (he of the ailing knee) was told to stay home to rest up for Weymouth on Tuesday.

All during the 90-minute drive south, there was hope that the skies would clear, the sun would come out, and the course might have a chance to dry out. Puddles? We weren't afraid of puddles. But when we arrived an inspected the course, it was obvious that rain or no rain, the major impediment to a fast race was the mud. Most of the course runs through the woods, and the rain had turned every soft spot into a bog of mud, sometimes 6-8 inches deep. No spikes on earth provide good traction in that much mud.

The NNHS boys were told to double- and triple-knot their spikes, to avoid having them sucked of their feet by the mud bogs. The rain did cease for a bit just before the championship race, and the temperatures were fairly mild for the introductions.

The race itself went out very fast. Tom Webb of Bishop Hendricken in RI took out the first mile in under five minutes, which, given the poor conditions might have been the physiological equivalent of a 4:40 mile in dry conditions. David Polgar established himself in 4-5th place early, with Doug Brecher lurking in the top 20. Also running were Noah Jampol, Peter Sun, Ben Chebot, and Charlie Krasnow. As the mud took its toll, Polgar faded back to 9th at the 2M mark, with Brecher in 17th only a few seconds back. Jampol still looked good at this point. Sun, Chebot, and Krasnow were running steadily towards the back of the very talented field.

The final 600m was on relatively solid ground, and that helped Polgar who had slipped to 13th, but rallied in the final 200 meters to outkick three other runners and finish 10th in 16:31. Brecher continued his strong run, and although he lost some places in the final mile, finished in 24th in 16:55, high enough to earn one of the prized race t-shirts. Jampol did not have a happy last mile, and finished in the low 18's (official results are not available yet). Sun was the 4th finisher for North, outdueling Brookline's Matt Stewart who figures to be a rival of Sun's in the 600 this winter. Chebot and Krasnow finished together.

Because of the mud, the times are misleading and not representative of what these runners will be able to do Tuesday. The Newton North team acquitted itself well.

There were a number of Mass. teams running. Brockton made a case for being the top team in the state, with Jr. Kevin Gill coming within a second of winning the championship race. His time of 15:57 in such awful conditions is very impressive and indicates that is in contention for the state championship. Mark Amirault of Xaverian and Jose DePina of Brockton finshed 4th and 5th, respectively. Brookline ran their varsity team, which looked strong even without their #3 runner Elliot Lehane. Matias Carrasco was top finisher for the Warriors in about 35th. Amherst, once ranked #1 in the state, was clearly not as strong as Brockton, but might be better on a different day on a different course.

At the end of the awards ceremony the rain started again. Nine straight days of rain in October. That was probably the only record that fell on Saturday.

October 14, 2005

Weekend Outlook

Someone pointed out that it has been raining ever since the Red Sox were eliminated from the Playoffs. Coincidence?

Forecasters are predicting more rain to start the weekend, but that only means more interesting cross-country. The big event on Saturday is the Brown Invitational, held in Goddard State Park in East Greenwich, Rhode Island. The course starts on a golf course, runs for about a half mile before entering a fairly narrow trail through a wooded area that borders Narragansett Bay. Runners proceed around a big loop and then come back the same way they started out, finishing on the golf course. In dry conditions, the course is considered very fast. (Last year's winning time was 15:00). It won't be dry this year! Heavy rains will lead to wide puddles all along the trail, slowing it down considerably, and making it treacherous. Newton North boys are sending a team, but they will be facing top-notch competition in the Championship race, including Brockton, Brookline, and Chelmsford from Mass., and several ranked teams, including Christian Brothers Academy (CBA) from New Jersey, and Bishop Hendricken from RI.

Also on Saturday, Franklin Park hosts the Catholic Memorial Invitational, favored by those teams that don't want to travel out of state to get a good competitive race. It is rumored that Xaverian will be running at the CMI event.

On Sunday, there is an open 5K "development" race at Frankln Park. Newton North assistant coaches are sometimes known to run such open events.

On the national scene, there is a big meet in Arkansas this weekend -- the Chili Pepper Invitational -- with races for both HS and collegiate runners. Newton North alum Chris Barnicle will be running his first 10K for Arkansas.